Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Goss

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 16, 2015No. Cage No. 3:14-cv-01135-SIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, James Michael Murphy (“Plaintiff’), brings this action against three members of the Oregon Medical Board (“OMB”): Nita Goss, Kent Williamson, and Kathleen Haley, as well as John/ Jane Doe, an unidentified employee of the OMB (collectively “Defendants”). Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 27). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is granted and this case is dismissed.

STANDARDS

A party is entitled to summary judgment if the “movant shows that there is no

*1237genuine dispute as to any material fact…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. E. Carolina Univ.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018
  2. Chaudhry v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Gudes v. Wilson HealthDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  4. Madera v. Taos Health Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
  5. Phillip P. Crace, M.D. v. Jorge CampoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API