Legal Opinion
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1993No. CV-92-0427-PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona (“Farmers”) and Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) ask this court to review a court of appeals’ opinion holding that injuries suffered during a car-to-car shooting “arose out of the use” of an uninsured motor vehicle. Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co., 174 Ariz. 66, 847 P.2d 111 (App.1992). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Farmers and Continental, but the court of appeals reversed. 174 Ariz. at 71, 847 P.2d at 116. Because we hold that the plaintiffs injuries did…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DeHaanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Salerno v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Moons v. KeithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Spradlin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Benevides v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.