Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance Company

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1968No. 36651PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

The plaintiff sues his own insurer for recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of his automobile liability policy. The primary question is whether the in solvency or the failure, to defend or pay a claim subsequent to the accident by a tort-feasor’s liability carrier constitutes a denial of such coverage by the tort-feasor’s carrier thereby invoking the liability of the plaintiff’s carrier under the uninsured motorist clause. The district court found for the plaintiff on this issue and we affirm the judgment.

Plaintiff, on November 17, 1964, was negligently injured by tort-feasor…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Storm v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  5. Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  4. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API