Legal Opinion
Blakeman v. Planning & Zoning Commission of Shelton
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 4, 2004No. AC 23825PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Catherine Blakeman and Huntington Homes, Inc.,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the city of Shelton. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly dismissed their zoning appeal because (1) their right to build twenty-four condominium units did not expire automatically at the conclusion of the five year time period set forth in the Shelton planned development district regulations and (2) the defendant improperly relied on the report of the fire chief of the city…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Hill v. State Employees Retirement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Miskimen v. BiberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.