Legal Opinion

People v. Crenshaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1946No. Crim. 1953PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Defendant was charged with a violation of section 4502 of the Penal Code, in that on the 12th day of March, 1945, he wilfully and unlawfully and feloniously, while a prisoner confined in Folsom prison, did possess and carry upon his person and have under his custody and control, a sharp instrument. He was convicted by a jury, a motion for a new trial was denied, and he has appealed from both the judgment and the order denying a new trial.

Section 4502 of the Penal Code, which was enacted in 1943, so far as material here provides:

“Every prisoner committed to a State prison who, while at such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. In Re Application of ReinegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. KronckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API