People v. Moreland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TUTTLE, J.* —
On December 28, 1976, defendant was charged in an information with a violation of section 246 of the Penal Code.1 At that time section 246 read in pertinent part: “Any person who shall maliciously and wilfully discharge a firearm at an inhabited dwelling house or occupied building, is guilty of a felony, ...” (Stats. 1949, ch. 698, § 1, p. 1200.)2
The question presented in this appeal is of fundamental significance: In determining whether defendant was properly charged with a violation of section 246, should the words “inhabited dwelling house or *15occupied building” as used…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- DENO CONSTANTINE KANARAS v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. StepneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Humboldt Bay Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.