Legal Opinion

People v. Ferguson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1933No. Docket No. 2225PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

This case was decided by this court September 19, 1932. Later a rehearing was granted and we now, after a thorough re-examination of the case and authorities, arrive at the same conclusion that we heretofore announced. In granting a rehearing we were impressed with the idea that the decision was harsh and that it was entirely possible that a man with innocent intent might be sent to the penitentiary. We have ever had this in mind during our re-examination. We cannot, however, avoid the rule as expressed in the opinion, upon ample authority and reason, that “Where the power exists to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. CamperlingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Matter of Yun QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. SatchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hentzner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. FavaloraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API