Legal Opinion

People v. Kroncke

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1999No. A077974PublishedCited by 20 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

J.A jury convicted appellant Mark A. Kroncke of failing to stop and report an auto accident (Veh. Code, §§ 20001, 20003),1 a felony, and giving false information to a police officer (Veh. Code, § 31), a misdemeanor.

The principal issue is whether sections 20001 and 20003 require that a driver involved in an injury-producing accident identify himself as the driver, when that is not reasonably apparent. As we shall explain, the pertinent sections do impose such a duty. We further conclude that requiring the driver to inform investigating officers that he or she was the driver…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  2. People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Clancy v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Lamarr Ramon Masean Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
  5. People v. HernandezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API