Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1950No. Crim. 2653PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Section 4502 of the Penal Code makes it a felony for any prisoner committed to a state prison to possess, carry upon his person, or have under his custody, among other things, . . any dirk or dagger or sharp instrument ...” Harris was charged with and convicted of a violation of this section in that on March 6, 1949, while an inmate of San Quentin, he unlawfully possessed “a sharp instrument, to-wit: a metal wood chisel . . . with a sharpened point.” At the trial Harris elected to conduct his own defense, but on this appeal is represented by counsel. He appeals from the judgment of conviction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. HarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. CrawfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Flowers v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API