Legal Opinion
Hanson v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 29, 2002No. 02-0019PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company appeals a judgment declaring its reducing clause unenforceable. Prudential sought to enforce a reducing clause contained in Gary Hanson's underinsured motorist (UIM) policy and limit its liability to $25,000 based on payments Hanson received from the underinsured motorist's insurer. The circuit court denied Prudential's motion, determining the policy was ambiguous and the reducing clause unenforceable.
¶ 2. On appeal, Prudential contends the circuit court erred in this determination and argues its UIM coverage is not ambiguous based on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Commercial Union Midwest Insurance v. VorbeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Donna E. Keca and Trisha Bontempo, Individually and as Guardian of Miranda BontempoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Ruenger v. SoodsmaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Klinger v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.