Legal Opinion

City Bank & Trust Co. v. Hurd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1914No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Lake; Withey, J. Bill by the City Bank & Trust Company against James D. Hurd and others for an injunction. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This suit primarily involves the validity of an execution levy on 16 electric motors in the *456county of Lake, Mich., as against a foreign unrecorded trust deed, or indenture, in its nature a mortgage, covering all its grantor’s then owned and after-acquired real and personal property. Said levy was made at the instance of defendant Hurd herein, who, as plaintiff in an attachment suit entitled James D. Hurd v. Mobile Portland Cement & Coal Company, recovered a judgment in said Lake county, on October 24, 1911, for $1,637.68, against the defendant, which was a Maine corporation having most of its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brown v. BrabbMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. American Cigar Co. v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Littauer v. HouckMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. First National Bank v. GuntermannMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Charlet v. TeakleMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Smith v. MosierMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Stram v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API