Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brabb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Midland. (Hart, J.) Bill to cancel a mortgage as fraudulent as to creditors. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Complainant filed a bill in the Midland circuit setting forth that January 14, 1884, John J. Byan and Ethelbert J. Brewster, of Midland City, were doing business as John J. Byan & Co., and on that date they made an assignment to complainant, for the benefit of their creditors, of all their property and rights not exempt from execution, without preference, who accepted the trust, and qualified as such assignee, and proceeded to carry out the trust as. such assignee.

That on January 4, without his knowledge or the knowledge or consent of Brewster, Byan, in the firm name, gave a chattel mortgage…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Thompson v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Yeatman v. Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Smith & Hoe v. AckerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  5. Parshall v. . EggertNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. First National Bank of Rock Springs v. LudvigsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API