Legal Opinion

Littauer v. Houck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The defendant, as constable, levied upon a stock of boots and shoes under an execution issued from justice’s court. The execution was in favor of Rindge, Bertsch & Co., and against Alfred Taylor and Gerald Eitzgibbon. The claim upon which the execution was issued was an account which accrued about September 1, 1889. The defendants in the writ, Taylor & Fitzgibbon, had been partners in the boot and shoe business in Bay City; but their partnership ceased April 15, 1889, Taylor continuing in the business. Alfred Taylor was a resident of West Bay City, where he had lived for several years. On…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. BrabbMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wise v. CurdesIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Farrell v. PaulusMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Katz v. KowalskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. City Bank & Trust Co. v. HurdMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API