Legal Opinion

Charlet v. Teakle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hally, J. Bill by Frank Charlet against Robert T. Teakle for the specific performance of an agreement for a lease. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to oh *428tain a decree for the specific performance of an agreement for a lease claimed to have been made by defendant with the plaintiff. The case was heard upon the pleadings and testimony taken in open court, and the learned circuit judge who heard the case filed a written opinion therein. In the absence of a proper statement of the facts of the case by counsel, we here insert the said opinion, to wit:

“In this case the complainant, being a saloon keeper, went into possession of certain property upon Grand River avenue as a tenant of the West Side Brewery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City Bank & Trust Co. v. HurdMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Babcock v. TwistMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Morrison v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Willard v. ShekellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Woodworth v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hay v. LebusMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Woodworth v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API