Legal Opinion
Petrovich v. City of Arcadia
California Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1950No. L. A. 20761PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the city of Arcadia for the rescission and cancellation of his bid to construct sanitary improvements in that city, and for the exoneration of the surety on the bid bond. The city cross-complained joining the surety as a defendant, and prayed for a forfeiture of the bond and for judgment in the full amount thereof. Judgment went against each of the parties on their respective pleadings. The city has appealed from the judgment adverse to it.
In the early part of 1946 the city was duly authorized by popular vote to incur a bonded indebtedness of $350,000…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wheaton Building & Lumber Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Diaz v. Grill Concepts Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Krechuniak v. NoorzoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.