Legal Opinion

Krechuniak v. Noorzoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 2017No. H042740PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALSH, J. * —

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal challenges an order enforcing an agreement between two siblings, Aisha A. Krechuniak (Sister) 1 and her brother Zia Jamal Noorzoy (Brother), settling litigation concerning the failed development of a residential parcel in Pebble Beach. Sister was awarded a stipulated judgment of $850,000 against Brother as provided in their “MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT.” Brother’s appeal contends that this amount includes a liquidated damages penalty of $250,000 that is unenforceable under Civil Code section 1671, an argument he did not make in the trial court. 2

We…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ridgley v. Topa Thrift & Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vitatech Int'l, Inc. v. Sporn, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Dli Props. LLC v. HillCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
  3. Estate v. Joya, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Ali Nowaid and Breeze Capital Group, LLC v. American Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Biasi v. Nielson CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API