Krechuniak v. Noorzoy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALSH, J. * —
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal challenges an order enforcing an agreement between two siblings, Aisha A. Krechuniak (Sister) 1 and her brother Zia Jamal Noorzoy (Brother), settling litigation concerning the failed development of a residential parcel in Pebble Beach. Sister was awarded a stipulated judgment of $850,000 against Brother as provided in their “MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT.” Brother’s appeal contends that this amount includes a liquidated damages penalty of $250,000 that is unenforceable under Civil Code section 1671, an argument he did not make in the trial court. 2
We…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Ridgley v. Topa Thrift & Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vitatech Int'l, Inc. v. Sporn, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Dli Props. LLC v. HillCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
- Estate v. Joya, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ali Nowaid and Breeze Capital Group, LLC v. American Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Biasi v. Nielson CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.