United States v. Dean
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises the question of whether a district court has the authority to modify a portion of a plea agreement relating to the civil forfeiture of property. In this case, after accepting the defendant’s plea of guilty, the district court modified the plea agreement. The modification released the defendant from his promise to withdraw his claim to seized funds. The court based its decision to alter the terms of the agreement on the ground that the forfeiture would violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause. The government argues that the district court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. HowleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. KummerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. PerezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Chaim v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.