Legal Opinion
United States v. Rubio
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 31, 2000No. 99-8101PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
I
A grand jury indicted Defendant Jaime Rubio on several drug-related counts. Count 1 of the indictment charged Defendant with conspiracy to traffic in methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to a plea agreement in which he waived the right to appeal his sentence, Defendant pled guilty to Count 1. The plea agreement states in relevant'part: “The Defendant agrees to waive his right to appeal the sentence he receives as a result of this Plea Agreement. However, if the United States appeals the Defendant’s sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge VENCES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jesus Arturo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James v. AtterberryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Eldon Ray JamesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Gul Khan KhattakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Angelica GwinnettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.