Legal Opinion

County of Amador v. Huberty

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1962No. Civ. 10401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

The County of Amador brought this action against Leotta M. Huberty, the county auditor, and Elmer G. Evans, the acting county treasurer, for the purpose of having the legality of a contract between the county and the Jackson Valley Irrigation District determined. The individual defendants had indicated that they had doubts as to the legality of the contract and that they would not issue or pay any warrant under the contract until directed to do so by a judgment of a proper court. After the action was filed the Jackson Valley Irrigation District was permitted to intervene and filed a complaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Pac. Sewer Pipe Co. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Beckwith v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. (2000), California Attorney General Reports2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API