Legal Opinion
Beckwith v. County of Stanislaus
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1959No. Civ. 9620PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
The county of Stanislaus, its board of supervisors, Turlock Irrigation District, and the members of its board of directors have appealed from an order of the superior court granting Ralph Beckwith, a taxpayer of the county, a preliminary injunction enjoining the county and its board of supervisors from paying to the district sums due pursuant to three contracts entered into between the county and the district, by the terms of which the district erected three bridges for the county.
The facts are as follows: In August, 1957, the county of Stanislaus and the Turlock Irrigation District entered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Madera v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Copeland v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kentucky-Indiana Municipal Power Ass'n v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2021
- Zack v. Marin Emergency Radio AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Robings v. Santa Monica Mountains ConservancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.