Pac. Sewer Pipe Co. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
Plaintiff herein is suing upon a contractor ’s bond for the purpose of recovering money for material furnished for use in certain street improvement work. The case was submitted upon stipulated facts which are as follows: Pursuant to the provisions of an act providing for work upon streets, etc., within municipalities, commonly known as the Vrooman Act (Gen. Laws 1915, p. 1714, Act 3930), the board of public works of the city of Los Angeles and the California-Arizona Construction Company entered into a contract for the performance by the latter of certain street work in the city of Los…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Burnett v. StearnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hadley v. DagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Carter v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Perkins v. CowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Dolese Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Carter v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Dusold v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
- County of Amador v. HubertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.