Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Illman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
From a review of the record there is very little dispute as to evidence adduced before the board. Whether one of the two checks was paid by the Yaneys to respondent for present or past legal services is of no great significance. Respondent admitted preparing the deeds and the wills, and admitted receiving at least one check for such services. By no stretch of the imagination can the activity of the respondent be considered as paralegal or legal-intern services, as there was no semblance of compliance with the Ohio rules as to supervised limited practice of law by legal interns. See Gov. R.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of DoeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
- In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against CarrOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- In re Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for ColburnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CharacterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.