Legal Opinion

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Carr

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1996No. 95-2194PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

This is the first case in which this court is asked to review enforcement of Canon 7 of the Code of Judicial Conduct and related disciplinary procedures in Section 5, Rule II of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary.

Canon 7 was revised as a result of a review of Ohio’s judicial election system by the Citizens’ Committee on Judicial Elections established by the Supreme Court in 1994. The committee tackled issues of campaign conduct, campaign finance, enforcement and sanctions, and the public’s perception of the judicial system in Ohio and proposed what ultimately became…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. IllmanOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HeilandOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Supreme Court of Ohio v. Bertche (In Re Bertsche)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. CharacterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API