Legal Opinion

Matter of Roberts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1983No. 881S207PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary matter has been brought by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission by way of a Verified Complaint charging the Respondent with failing to report improper conduct of a venireman. The Hearing Officer appointed pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23 has heard this matter and has submitted his findings and conclusions of law. The Respondent has petitioned for review and has requested oral argument. The Commission has filed a response.

This Court has reviewed all matters submitted in this case and now finds that Respondent’s request for oral argument should be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. In the Matter of Julius Lucius Echeles, an AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KraschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Matter of MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Matter of McDanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hite v. HaaseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Matter of GerardIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API