In re Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for Colburn
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In his motion to dismiss, respondent cites previous decisions of this court and R.C. 2725.051 to the effect that when a person alleged to be restrained of his liberty is restrained pursuant to the judgment or order of a court that had jurisdiction to make the judgment or order, then the writ of habeas corpus will not be allowed. The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum does not inquire into the lawfulness of restraint; it merely addresses the discretion of the court to permit the person detained to appear as a witness. Cuckovich v. United States (C.A. 6, 1948), 170 F. 2d 89, certiorari…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Ball v. WoodsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1975
- Cuckovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Eastman v. EastmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Miles v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mancino v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kordis v. KordisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State v. GolstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CharacterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Savage v. Savage, Unpublished Decision (11-26-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.