Legal Opinion

Streff v. Gold Medal Creamery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1928No. Docket No. 3637PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action upon a written contract to recover $1,780.30 alleged to be due on account of 4,685 gallons of milk sold defendant. Judgment went for plaintiff in the sum of $1,764.72, and this appeal is prosecuted therefrom.

The complaint is in the ordinary form for milk sold and delivered between the dates of October 1, 1924, and November 8, 1924. The answer denies the allegations, and then proceeds, in fourteen pages, to set up three counterclaims. The first of these sets up an express and agreed warranty as to the quality of the milk sold. It is alleged that between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Union Oil Co. v. Purissima Hills Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kenney v. GroganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Franck v. J. J. Sugarman-Rudolph Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Williams v. LowenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. China National Metal Products Import/Export Co. v. Apex Digital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
  5. Cooperative Dairymen's League v. Lucerne Cream & Butter Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API