Union Oil Co. v. Purissima Hills Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Fred H. Taft, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued on two counts: One for balance due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold at an agreed price; the other for the reasonable value of such goods. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff for the full amount demanded. Defendant appeals.
The goods sold and delivered by plaintiff’s assignor consisted principally of casing necessary for the use of defendant in the creation of an oil well on its property. The merehan dise was delivered between the 31st of January and the 31st of August, 1911. Defendant paid one thousand five hundred dollars on account.' The judgment prayed for and given…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry.California Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- County First National Bank v. Coast Dairies & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cornelison v. United States Building & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. MelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.