Legal Opinion
Asamen v. Thompson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1942No. Civ. 2836PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
On an appeal from an order refusing to dismiss an attachment in the above-entitled action this day decided (ante, p. 657 [131 P.2d 839]), the allegations of the original complaint were summarized and the issue there presented was determined.
On February 28, 1940, plaintiff and respondent filed his amended complaint, alleged the transaction and agreement set forth in the original complaint, designated the Crown Packing Company, a corporation, as party defendant, and alleged generally that J. L. Thompson and J. T. Bunn acted together as a copartnership and that in transacting their business as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Estrada v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Getty Refining & Marketing Co. v. Park Oil, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.