Legal Opinion
Byrne v. Bellingham Consolidated School District No. 301
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1941No. 28132PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiff, an electrical contractor, brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him and his assignor because of the delay to which they had been subjected during their performance of certain work connected with the construction of a school building. Trial before the court, without a jury, resulted in findings from which the court concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to recover. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff has appealed.
On or about October 14, 1936, the Henrikson-Alstrom Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as the general contractor,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Wick v. Western Union Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Norcross v. . WillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ericksen v. Edmonds School District No. 15Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Seattle v. Dyad Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Dobson v. Rutgers, State UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Nelse Mortensen & Co. v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Estate Of Lois S. Carter v. Bryan D. Carden, Et UxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.