Legal Opinion

White v. Mitchell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1923No. 17536PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The plaintiffs, who are sisters, owned a small tract of land near the town of Sumner, in this state, on which they desired to construct a dwelling. The defendants are experienced housebuilders, residing in the city of Tacoma. About the 1st of September, 1920, the plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendants for the construction of such dwelling. This contract was partly in writing and partly oral. There were some drawings and some written specifications. The house was to be a two-story building, of a certain size and of a certain class of material, and the finishing of the building…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ashland Lime, Salt & Cement Co. v. ShoresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. White v. McLarenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Carlson v. SheehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Cramp & Co. v. Central Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. v. Brookhollow, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hoye v. Century Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. George B. Gilmore Co. v. GarrettMississippi Supreme Court · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API