Legal Opinion
E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The trial court dismissed this case upon the theory that inasmuch as the plaintiff, in order to obtain *316any relief whatsoever as against any herein named defendant, must rely upon the continuance in force of its contract of January 10, 1917, with the Western Company, and since neither the Wisconsin nor Milwaukee companies came into existence earlier than March, 1922, and could have had no part in the alleged breach by the Western Company in January, 1920, therefore the vital question as to whether or not there had been a breach by the Western Company of the obligations on its part under the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Lien v. Northwestern Engineering Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- First Wisconsin National Bank of Madison v. NicolaouCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.