Rogers Dev. Co. v. Southern California Real Estate Inv. Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from an order refusing a new trial. E. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Elmer R. McDowell, E. Earl Crandall, and William Hazlett, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff sued to foreclose agreements for the sale of certain parcels of land, and to recover possession thereof and quiet title thereto, and obtained judgment as prayed for. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
On September 14,1906, the plaintiff and defendant executed six separate written agreements constituting parts of one transaction, whereby plaintiff sold to defendant a number of tracts of land containing, in all, 1154.45 acres, at prices aggregating $154,837.50. The agreements contemplated the subdivision of the land, the sale…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wittenbrock v. CassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gallagher v. Equitable Gas Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Sels v. BunnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Siddall v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ford v. Ford'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Wright v. SalzbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.