Legal Opinion

Sels v. Bunnell

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1898No. Sac. No. 271PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. Add 0. Hickson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a lien upon the real property of defendant C. Bunnell. The Ger-mania Building and Loan Association was made a defendant. It answered, setting up a mortgage upon the property executed to it by Bunnell, and asked that this mortgage be declared a lien prior and superior to that of plaintiff.

The court found defendant Bunnell to be indebted to plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty-seven' dollars and fifty cents, gave plaintiff judgment for that amount, together with attorney’s fees and costs, decreed to him a lien upon the property superior to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  2. Carey v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Curtis v. RootIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Mayburry v. BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. Moring v. . DickersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vickrey v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cheves v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Rogers Dev. Co. v. Southern California Real Estate Inv. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Marin v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Mercantile Collection Bureau v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API