Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1954No. 18499PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sutton, Justice.

The special ground of the motion for new trial complains that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the propounder, because the evidence presented an issue of fact which should have been submitted to the jury: (a) on the question of whether the testator had sufficient testamentary capacity at the time the will was executed; (b) whether the propounder had exercised undue influence over the testator in causing him to execute the will; (c) whether the will executed by the testator was executed under a mistake of fact.

“Where there is no conflict in the evidence,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Dyar v. DyarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Fehn v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Penn v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thornton v. HulmeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Kersey v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Cross v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Beman v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API