Anderson v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sutton, Justice.
The special ground of the motion for new trial complains that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the propounder, because the evidence presented an issue of fact which should have been submitted to the jury: (a) on the question of whether the testator had sufficient testamentary capacity at the time the will was executed; (b) whether the propounder had exercised undue influence over the testator in causing him to execute the will; (c) whether the will executed by the testator was executed under a mistake of fact.
“Where there is no conflict in the evidence,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Dyar v. DyarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Fehn v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Penn v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thornton v. HulmeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Kersey v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Cross v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Beman v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.