Fehn v. Shaw
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Where testamentary capacity is the issue, the controlling question to be determined is the condition of the mind at the time of the execution of the will. As tending to illustrate the mental condition at that time, evidence of such condition at other times may be received, but where it is sought to establish testamentary incapacity by such evidence, it does not controvert the positive testimony of the subscribing witnesses unless it would be proof of testamentary incapacity at the time the will was signed.(a) Applying the above principle to this case, there was nothing in the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hill v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Orr v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Scott v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Hillyer v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Northwestern University v. CrispSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Whitfield v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Pantone v. PantoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Spivey v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Borenstein v. BlumenfeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.