Beman v. Stembridge
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
Only the second headnote requires elaboration. “Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences there from, shall demand a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Code § 110-104. The mere fact that there are conflicts in the testimony does not render the direction of a verdict in favor of a party erroneous, when it appears that the conflicts are immaterial, and that, giving to the opposite party the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence as a whole and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Fehn v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Govin v. HunterWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Joiner v. JoinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Lee v. BoyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Wilson v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- McTyre v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.