Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Hulme

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1962No. 21830PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

Caveator urges that the court erroneously directed a verdict for propounder because there was an issue of fact under the evidence relating to the proper execution of the will, that is, “whether testatrix signed the will in the presence of all of the purported witnesses, and whether the purported witnesses signed in the presence of the testatrix and the other witnesses.” A statement of basic rules is in order. The attesting witnesses must sign in the presence of the testator. Code Ann. § 113-301. The testator must either sign in the presence of the attesting witnesses or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bohler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Whitfield v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Dibble v. CurrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Irvin v. AskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Dyer v. SoutherSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Glenn v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Yancey v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Trauner v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n (In re Simpson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API