Wilson & Co. v. Douredoure
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff brought an action in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to recover $20,674.66 paid by it to Douredoure Brothers through an alleged mistake of fact. The defendants admitted the receipt of the money, denied that the payments were the result of a mistake of fact and counter-claimed for an additional $2,501.85. Douredoure Brothers brought Keystone Rendering Company, Inc., into the suit as third party defendant. The case was tried by a judge of the district court without a jury. He denied recovery to the plaintiff and entered judgment on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allshouse v. RamsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BeneventoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Lauffer v. VialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Capraro v. PropatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Gilberton Fuels, Inc. v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- United States Ex Rel. Hunt v. Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Quinn v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (In Re Sturm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- T & L Leasing Corp. v. General Electric Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Rodek v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1997