Legal Opinion

Capraro v. Propati

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The enforcement of an express private trust was within the general exclusive jurisdiction of equity as derived from the English Chancery. In time, the jurisdiction was extended to the estates of deceased persons. This equitable authority to compel the due administration of the personal estate of deceased persons, in favor of creditors, legatees, and other parties in interest, is generally justified as the execution of an express active trust. Yet it seems to have been a gradual development of a function originally exclusive in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  2. Green's Administratrix v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Curriden v. MiddletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Upham v. DraperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ripling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Township of Ewing v. TrentonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. S.P. Dunham Co. v. 26 E. State St. Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Wright v. Cion Corp. Peruna DesvasporesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Livingston v. ReinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API