Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Hunt v. Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 2004No. CIV.A.00-737, CIV.A.99-2332PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NEWCOMER, Senior District Judge.

This is an intervened qui tam action in which relief under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., the Public Contracts Anti-Kickback Act (“AKA”), 41 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., and the common law is sought. 1 Presently before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

I. Procedural History

Plaintiffs, Relators Hunt, Gauger, and Piacentile, and the United States Government, 2 allege that Defendant Medco 3 systematically defrauded the Government through its relationship with Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (“Blue Cross”), a health…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Neifert-White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Caremark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States ex rel. Washington v. Education Management Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. United States ex rel. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. United States ex rel. Simpson v. Bayer Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  5. United States ex rel. Grubea v. Rosicki, Rosicki & Assocs., P.C.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API