Legal Opinion

Sellman v. Haddock

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1957No. 6122PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIKER, Justice.

On May 9, 1955, in Hatch, New Mexico, plaintiff’s auto and defendant’s truck collided within an intersection of two streets. Damage was done to both vehicles. Plaintiff’s automobile was repaired at a cost of $533.21. Plaintiff paid $50 only of the cost of the repair of his automobile. Plaintiff’s insurer paid the balance. The foregoing facts are stated in the findings made by the court.

Under Rule 36 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts the defendant made written request of plaintiff f.or certain admissions of fact. In answer to this request plaintiff admitted…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. American Trust & Savings Bank v. ScobeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hugh K. Gale Post No. 2182 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. NorrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Keirsey v. HirschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Harris v. Illinois-California Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API