Beecroft v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment in favor of respondent-mortgagee, appellant-mortgagors assert that the existence of disputed material facts as to respondent’s right to foreclose a mortgage on appellants’ property precludes summary judgment. Appellants assert that the district court erroneously concluded that respondent satisfied the statutory requirements to foreclose by advertisement. Appellants also argue that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether respondent acquired title to the mortgage by a valid assignment. We affirm in part and remand.
FACTS
In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wolff v. Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Finnegan v. SunTrust MortgageDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Kebasso v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Inves. P'shipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Leifur v. LeifurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.