Leifur v. Leifur

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this maintenance-modification dispute, appellant-husband argues that the district court erred by invalidating the parties’ mediated agreement that any *41modification of spousal support would be retroactive to a specific date before the modification motion was served. Because MinmStat. § 518A.39, subd. 2(e), prohibits the district court from adopting the mediated agreement, we affirm.

FACTS

The parties’ marriage was dissolved by a stipulated judgment in November 2006. Under the judgment, respondent-wife is the primary caretaker of the parties’ three children. The judgment…