Legal Opinion
City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Inves. P'ship
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 2, 2012No. Nos. A11-644, A11-1471PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.*
These consolidated appeals involve respondent city’s attempt to expand a road and to pay for that expansion with special assessments on appellants’ properties. In appeal All-1471, appellants challenge the legality of a petition to expand the road that was submitted by Central Lakes College pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 429.031. Appellants argue that because the college is owned by the State of Minnesota, and special assessments cannot be made against state-owned property, the district court erred by concluding that the college may be considered an “owner” for purposes of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Billigmeier v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Northern States Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Knudson v. KylloNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013