Legal Opinion

State v. Childs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2000No. Nos. 98-2227 and 98-2462PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether an indictment for conspiracy pursuant to R.C. 2923.01, which fails to allege at least one specific, substantial, overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, is fatally defective for such failure. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we answer that question in the affirmative.

Childs was convicted of conspiracy to commit aggravated trafficking in violation of R.C. 2923.01(A)(2) and (former) 2925.03(A)(2). R.C. 2923.01(B) describes the crime of conspiracy. This section of the Revised Code provides:

“No person shall be convicted of conspiracy unless…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. SkatzesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. McFarland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. TroisiOhio Supreme Court · 2022

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API