Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Leis v. Outcalt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1982No. 82-14PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

A writ of mandamus will issue if appellant shows appellee is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, that appellant has a clear legal right to the requested relief and that appellant has no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6 [15 O.O.3d 3], paragraph one of the syllabus.

I

Inasmuch as appellee was without authority to grant the witness use immunity, appellee is under a clear legal duty to set aside his decision granting immunity.

*148In this state, criminal procedure is governed entirely by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SinitoOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. BroadyOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Landrum v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. City of Columbus v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Koren v. GroganOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. ReinerOhio Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API