Legal Opinion

State v. Reiner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2000No. Nos. 99-239 and 99-427PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

The Lucas County Court of Appeals stated the certified conflict as “whether Evid.R. 606(B) permits, under any circumstances, inquiry of a juror as to the effect of extraneous information or improper outside *349influence upon his or her decision making process.” The dissenting judge framed the same issue as follows: “[I]n a case of jury misconduct (statements, conversations or remarks made to a juror), once evidence aliunde of jury misconduct is provided, whether a court may inquire of a juror as to whether or not the juror remained uninfluenced by the misconduct (i.e., impartial) so that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ohio v. ReinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. State v. HesslerOhio Supreme Court · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API