Legal Opinion
Booker v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1989No. 69685PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The appeal before us is the result of an action filed by Tammy Booker, now Loar (hereinafter plaintiff), against the distributor and manufacturer of a wall heater, Sears Roebuck & Company and White Rogers Division of Emerson Electric Company respectively. Also included as defendants were the propane gas wholesaler, J.D. Fite d/b/a Clayton Propane, Inc. (hereinafter wholesaler) and the gas retailer, Kiamichi Valley LP Gas Co. (hereinafter retailer); the petition contained allegations of negligence against both of these defendants. By an amended petition, plaintiff added the gas…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- United General Insurance Co. v. Crane Carrier Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Berry v. BarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gray v. HolmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Barnett v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Woolard v. JLG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.