Legal Opinion

Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 2013No. 1110786PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.

Precision Gear Company, Precision Gear LLC, and General Metal Heat Treating, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the gear manufacturers”), third-party defendants in the underlying action, were granted permission to appeal from the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to dismiss the third-party claims against them filed by Continental Motors, Inc. See Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P. The trial court certified the following controlling question of law:

“In an action for non-contractual indemnification arising from an accident and alleged damage[ ] in Oklahoma,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. American Heritage Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Heritage Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  2. Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Reece v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  4. AFC Franchising LLC v. FabbroDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  5. Andrea N. Smith, Personal Representative of the Estate of Angela H. Purnell, et al. v. Hannigan Fairing Co., Ltd., et al.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API