Legal Opinion
Gray v. Holman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 31, 1995No. 75215PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
The issues presented on certiorari are: (1) Does Robert Alan Tarr [Tarr] have standing to press his claim for loss of property by fire against Republic Underwriters Insurance Company [Republic or insurer] and Fred Holman [Holman or agent]? (2) Was the theory of bad-faith refusal to settle an insurance claim preserved for corrective relief by Ruth Gray [Gray] and Tarr’s [collectively insureds] appellate paperwork? (3) Did the case present controverted facts that are material to the insureds’ claim for (a) Republic’s bad-faith refusal to settle and (b) Holman’s negligence in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.